Leonid Solomatkin – Glorifiers
1868.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
У этого художника, неисчерпаемый запас творческих идей, – одна беда, он рисовать не умеет. Прежде чем писать маслом надо хорошо прорисовать всю композицию углем, у него же – прекрасные жанровые идеи но полное отсутствие профессионализма в графике. Видимо он любил живопись, но писал для себя, поэтому и наличие множества ошибок – в анатомическом образе, короче : чем лучше графика, тем легче писать маслом. А он писал, не заботясь о длине рук, просто – художник – любитель.
You cannot comment Why?
To the left stands an older woman, her face etched with lines indicative of age and hardship. She is draped in dark clothing, a headscarf partially obscuring her hair, and leans heavily on a wooden table for support. A sheet of paper lies upon this table, its contents unreadable but suggesting some form of written communication or record. Her posture conveys weariness and perhaps resignation.
Facing her is another elderly woman, leaning on a walking stick. She wears a voluminous, patched garment, indicative of poverty and the necessity of mending worn clothing. A basket hangs from her arm, likely containing meager possessions. The artist has rendered her face with considerable detail, emphasizing the fragility of age and the toll of a difficult life.
Between these two women stands a young boy, positioned centrally within the scene. He is dressed in brighter attire – a blue jacket and trousers – and holds a small candle aloft, offering it to the older woman. His posture is upright, his expression earnest, suggesting innocence and generosity. The contrast between his clothing and the somber garments of the women highlights the generational divide and perhaps symbolizes hope or renewal.
The room itself contributes significantly to the painting’s atmosphere. Walls are adorned with simple wallpaper, a clock hangs on the wall, indicating the passage of time, and coats hang on hooks – all suggesting an ordinary, working-class household. The limited depth of field focuses attention on the figures and their interaction, creating a sense of intimacy and immediacy.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of poverty, charity, and intergenerational relationships. The older women embody hardship and dependence, while the boy represents compassion and potential for future kindness. The candle itself functions as a potent symbol – representing not only light in a dark space but also hope, faith, and the enduring human capacity for empathy even amidst adversity. The scene is imbued with a quiet dignity; it avoids sentimentality, instead presenting a poignant observation of everyday life and the complexities of human connection within a context of economic disparity.