На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
матриархат
You cannot comment Why?
The figure holds what appears to be a doll or small child in its arms. This secondary figure mirrors the larger ones coloring and possesses similarly simplified features, creating a sense of kinship or surrogate relationship. Both figures are clothed in garments marked by repetitive dot-like patterns, which contribute to the overall impression of stylized representation rather than realistic depiction. The footwear consists of boots with prominent laces, adding a touch of playful detail.
The drawing’s subtexts revolve around themes of identity and connection. The exaggerated features and unusual coloring suggest an exploration of difference or perhaps a deliberate rejection of conventional beauty standards. The presence of the doll/child introduces notions of nurturing, responsibility, and potentially, loneliness – suggesting a desire for companionship or a symbolic representation of inner vulnerability. The repetitive patterns on the clothing could be interpreted as a visual metaphor for routine, conformity, or even obsessive tendencies. Ultimately, the work conveys an unsettling yet strangely endearing portrait of a figure grappling with self-perception and interpersonal relationships within a world rendered in stark, unconventional terms.