Mauritshuis – Gabriel Metsu - The Triumph of Justice
c.1655-1660, 152.5×120 cm.
Gabriel Metsu (1629-1667)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition is structured around this central figure, with several supporting elements contributing to the narrative. Two winged figures, presumably cherubs, hover above her, one holding a laurel wreath – a symbol of victory and honor – while the other appears to be presenting a crown. This placement reinforces the idea that justice, when properly administered, leads to reward and recognition.
Below the central figure lies a fallen man, seemingly defeated. He is surrounded by scattered coins and what appear to be documents, suggesting corruption or illicit gain as his downfall. A sword rests near him, further emphasizing his defeat and perhaps representing the punitive power of justice. The inclusion of these elements implies that injustice and greed are actively confronted and overcome by the principle represented by the central figure.
To her right, two figures kneel in apparent supplication or reverence. One is a woman shrouded in blue, cradling a child – a possible representation of piety or innocence seeking protection under the aegis of justice. The other is a young boy dressed in red, his hands clasped in what appears to be prayer or pleading. Their presence suggests that justice serves as a safeguard for vulnerable individuals and communities.
The background is dark and atmospheric, with architectural elements hinting at a grand setting – perhaps a temple or palace – further emphasizing the importance of the scene. The use of chiaroscuro (the contrast between light and shadow) draws attention to the central figure and highlights the drama of the narrative.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of moral accountability, the consequences of corruption, and the enduring power of impartial judgment. It suggests a hierarchical structure where justice reigns supreme, dispensing rewards for virtue and punishment for transgression. The overall effect is one of solemnity and didactic purpose – a visual sermon on the importance of upholding principles of fairness and righteousness.