На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The setting appears rural; fields stretch into the distance, punctuated by trees and what seems to be a small village nestled amongst them. The sky exhibits a soft, diffused light suggesting either dawn or dusk, contributing to a sense of tranquility that contrasts with the strenuous activity in the foreground. A building with distinctive architectural features is visible on the left side of the image, its design hinting at traditional construction techniques.
The color palette is restrained, relying heavily on earth tones – browns, greens, and muted reds – with accents of blue in the clothing of some laborers. The use of perspective is somewhat flattened, characteristic of certain printmaking traditions, which emphasizes the horizontal plane and the procession of figures across the bridge.
Beyond the literal depiction of physical labor, the image carries subtexts related to community effort and resilience. The collective action required to move such a substantial structure suggests interdependence and shared responsibility within the depicted society. The careful positioning of the building on the bridge implies relocation or reconstruction – a narrative that could symbolize adaptation, progress, or even displacement.
The inclusion of Japanese script in the upper right corner likely provides contextual information about the scene, potentially identifying the location or offering a poetic commentary on the event being portrayed. Overall, the work presents a snapshot of daily life and labor within a specific cultural context, imbued with symbolic weight beyond its immediate visual representation.