Château de Versailles – Alphonse de Neuville -- Bivouac in front of Le Bourget, after combat 21 December 1870
1872, 116х166
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a large group of men, presumably soldiers, huddled around several fires. They are wrapped in blankets or cloaks, indicating cold weather conditions. Their postures suggest exhaustion and dejection; many sit slumped on the ground, while others appear lost in thought. The artist has rendered their faces with minimal detail, emphasizing their anonymity within the larger collective experience of war.
Scattered across the foreground lie felled trees and what seem to be discarded military equipment – broken rifles, planks of wood, and other debris. Several figures are prone on the ground, seemingly wounded or deceased; their presence underscores the cost of conflict. The artist’s placement of these casualties in the immediate foreground draws the viewers attention to the human toll of war.
In the distance, a few mounted soldiers can be observed, suggesting a degree of order and continued military presence despite the overall sense of disarray. A small flock of birds flies overhead, adding a touch of naturalism to the scene but also perhaps symbolizing freedom or escape from the confines of the conflict.
The composition is structured around horizontal lines – the horizon line, the fallen trees, the arrangement of the soldiers – which contribute to a feeling of stability and permanence despite the evident chaos. The subdued color palette – dominated by greys, browns, and muted blues – reinforces the overall mood of melancholy and weariness.
Subtly, the painting conveys more than just a depiction of military life; it explores themes of loss, resilience, and the psychological impact of war on individuals. It is not a celebration of victory but rather a poignant reflection on the human cost of conflict and the enduring burden carried by those who participate in it. The ruined building itself can be interpreted as a metaphor for the shattered hopes and dreams left in the wake of battle.