Part 5 National Gallery UK – Peter Paul Rubens - The Apotheosis of the Duke of Buckingham
before 1625
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To his left, several female figures are arranged; some appear to offer garlands or floral tributes, while others seem to restrain him with delicate chains. Their expressions range from reverent adoration to a subtle hint of constraint. The flesh tones employed for these women are rendered in the characteristic Rubens style – full-bodied and sensuous, contributing to an atmosphere of opulent indulgence.
Above this group, a host of cherubic figures populate the upper portion of the canvas. They engage in playful activities, scattering flowers and generally celebrating the central figure’s elevation. Their presence reinforces the notion of divine favor and celestial blessing. Further back, within the cloudy expanse, more classical figures are discernible – reclining on clouds or emerging from architectural structures that suggest a grand, idealized setting.
The lower portion of the painting is occupied by further figures, some partially obscured by swirling drapery and cloud formations. These individuals seem to be engaged in acts of support and reverence, contributing to the overall sense of apotheosis – an elevation to divine status. The artist’s use of light and shadow creates a dynamic interplay across the scene, highlighting key figures while simultaneously obscuring others, adding depth and complexity to the narrative.
Subtleties within the work suggest layers of meaning beyond a straightforward depiction of ascension. The restraint implied by the chains held by the female figures hints at potential limitations or consequences associated with this elevated status. The mixture of adoration and constraint in their expressions introduces an element of ambiguity, questioning the nature of power and its inherent responsibilities. The circular format itself reinforces the idea of cyclical time and eternal glory, further emphasizing the subject’s supposed transcendence.