Johan August Malmström – Odysseus before Alcinous, King of the Phaeacians
1853.
Location: National Museum (Nationalmuseum), Stockholm.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The king sits upon a raised platform or dais, emphasizing his elevated status. He holds a staff in one hand, a symbol of authority, while his other hand rests on the arm of the woman seated beside him. The queen’s expression is contemplative, almost melancholic; she seems to observe the interaction with a mixture of curiosity and concern. A young child sits nestled against her, adding a domestic element to the otherwise formal setting.
Behind the central figures, a gathering of individuals are arranged around a table laden with food and drink. Their expressions range from attentive interest to detached observation. The lighting in this area is subdued, creating a sense of depth and drawing attention towards the primary interaction between the supplicant and the king. A partially drawn curtain on the left side introduces an element of theatricality, as if the scene were being staged for an audience.
The color palette is dominated by warm tones – reds, browns, and golds – which contribute to a sense of richness and grandeur. The use of chiaroscuro – the dramatic contrast between light and dark – heightens the emotional intensity of the moment. Light falls primarily on the kneeling man and the king, illuminating their faces and emphasizing their significance within the narrative.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of hospitality, power dynamics, and the vulnerability of those seeking refuge. The supplicants posture conveys a sense of desperation, while the king’s demeanor suggests both authority and potential compassion. The presence of the queen and child hints at the complexities of royal life – the balance between duty and familial affection. Ultimately, the scene encapsulates a moment of transition, where an individual in need is presented before a figure who holds the power to grant or deny assistance, leaving the viewer to ponder the outcome of this encounter.