William Henry Margetson – The Good Samaritan
Location: Private Collection
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Kneeling beside him is another figure, dressed in modest but substantial clothing – a blue robe and head covering. This individual’s gesture is central to the scene; he gently places a hand upon the wounded mans forehead, an action that implies compassion and care. The proximity of their faces suggests an attempt at connection, perhaps offering solace or assessing the extent of the injury.
Further up the slope stands a third figure, accompanied by another individual seated on what appears to be a cart or vehicle. This group is positioned in a way that indicates they have passed by without intervening; their distance and averted gazes suggest indifference or a deliberate choice not to engage with the suffering man’s plight. The receding perspective of this group emphasizes the isolation of the injured man and the compassion of the kneeling figure.
The artist employed a muted palette, dominated by earth tones – browns, ochres, and blues – which contribute to the scenes somber mood. The rendering is loose and impressionistic, with visible brushstrokes that lend texture and immediacy to the work. The landscape itself seems harsh and unforgiving, further highlighting the vulnerability of those depicted within it.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of empathy, responsibility, and social indifference. The contrast between the active compassion shown by one individual and the passive neglect displayed by others raises questions about moral obligation and human connection. The exposed body of the injured man serves as a stark reminder of fragility and need, while the kneeling figure embodies an act of selfless kindness. The background figures introduce a layer of complexity, prompting reflection on societal norms and the potential for individuals to choose detachment in the face of suffering. Ultimately, the work seems to advocate for a more humane response to those experiencing hardship.