Paul Gauguin – Woman in front of a Still Life by Cézanne
1890. 65×54 cm
Location: Art Institute, Chicago.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Меня она пугает. Эти глаза. Словно одержимая.
You cannot comment Why?
The composition presents a seated woman positioned before a table laden with objects, creating a layered visual experience. The woman occupies the foreground, her gaze directed towards the viewer with a directness that establishes immediate presence. Her attire consists of a pink blouse and a dark skirt, accented by a decorative brooch at the throat. A white collar adds a touch of formality to the ensemble. She is seated in an ornate chair upholstered in purple fabric, its design echoing the geometric forms present elsewhere in the painting.
Behind her, a still life unfolds across a table surface. The arrangement includes fruits – an orange prominently displayed alongside what appears to be a lime or lemon – as well as a glass and other indistinct objects arranged with deliberate asymmetry. A cloth drapes over part of the table, adding texture and obscuring some elements within the composition.
The color palette is dominated by muted tones: pinks, greens, blues, and browns are blended in broad strokes, creating a sense of solidity and weight. The application of paint appears thick and textured, contributing to a flattened perspective where depth cues are minimized. This technique reduces the illusion of three-dimensionality, emphasizing instead the surface qualities of the canvas.
The interaction between the woman and the still life is significant. She isnt merely positioned near the objects; she seems to be engaged with them, perhaps as their observer or even their subject. The arrangement of the still life feels less like a casual grouping and more like a carefully constructed display intended for her attention. This suggests a potential subtext concerning observation, representation, and the relationship between the viewer and the viewed.
The woman’s expression is difficult to decipher; it lacks overt emotion, presenting instead an air of quiet contemplation or perhaps even detachment. This ambiguity invites speculation about her role within the scene – is she a model? A muse? Or simply a participant in a staged tableau? The overall effect is one of deliberate artifice, where the boundaries between reality and representation are deliberately blurred.