Chaïm Soutine – Landscape in Cagnes (la Gaude)
1923. Oil on canvas, 81×100cm.
Location: National museum for modern art of France (Centre Pompidou) (Musée national d’Art moderne, Centre de création industrielle (MNAM, Centre Pompidou)), Paris.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see buildings clustered together, their architecture appearing somewhat simplified and abstracted. Rooflines are angular and irregular, windows are suggested rather than precisely depicted, and walls seem to shift in perspective. The structures appear less as representations of specific architectural styles and more as blocks of color and form contributing to the overall visual rhythm. A large building on the right side rises above the others, its height emphasized by a verticality that contrasts with the undulating terrain.
The landscape itself is equally stylized. Hills are not rendered with realistic contours but rather suggested through broad strokes of green and blue, creating an impression of depth without adhering to naturalistic representation. Trees, depicted in dark greens and reds, appear as dense masses of foliage, their forms further abstracted by the brushwork. The ground slopes upward towards the buildings, delineated by a band of yellow-ochre that acts as a visual pathway leading the eye into the heart of the settlement.
The application of paint is vigorous; thick impasto creates texture and contributes to the sense of movement. Brushstrokes are visible throughout, adding an energetic quality to the surface. The color choices contribute to a mood that is both vibrant and somewhat melancholic. While the yellows suggest sunlight and warmth, the prevalence of blues and greens evokes a feeling of introspection or perhaps even a subtle unease.
Subtly, theres a sense of displacement present in this scene. The buildings seem almost detached from their surroundings, existing as isolated entities within an environment that is equally fragmented. This could be interpreted as a commentary on the relationship between humanity and nature, or perhaps a reflection on the instability inherent in modern life. The lack of human figures further reinforces this feeling of detachment; the settlement appears inhabited but devoid of its inhabitants, creating a quiet stillness that invites contemplation.