Sebastiano Ricci – Archimedes refusal
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Around him are clustered several other figures, arranged in varying degrees of engagement with the central figures action. To his left, a man reclines on the ground, seemingly disengaged from the drama; he holds a scroll or tablet, suggesting scholarship but not active participation. Further back, a group appears to be observing the central figure’s pronouncements, their postures ranging from attentive interest to skeptical questioning. One individual leans against a tree trunk, his body angled away, hinting at reluctance or disagreement.
To the right of the central figure, a woman in elaborate robes sits on the ground, holding a vessel that might contain water or wine. She is surrounded by several smaller figures – possibly children or attendants – who gaze towards the main action with expressions of curiosity and wonder. Above them, partially obscured by foliage, are further figures, seemingly observing from an elevated position; among them, winged beings suggest a connection to the divine or a realm beyond mortal understanding.
The artist employs a muted palette dominated by earth tones – browns, greens, and ochres – which contribute to the scene’s somber and contemplative atmosphere. Light falls unevenly across the composition, highlighting the central figure and drawing attention to his gesture while leaving other areas in shadow. This selective illumination enhances the dramatic tension of the moment.
Subtleties within the painting suggest a narrative beyond mere observation. The refusal implied by the title likely refers to a rejection of an offer or request – perhaps political power, material wealth, or even a plea for assistance. The central figure’s posture and gesture convey not just disagreement but also a sense of intellectual integrity; he prioritizes something higher than worldly concerns. The presence of the woman and children on the right might symbolize domesticity or familial obligations that are being set aside in favor of principle. The winged figures hovering above could represent divine sanction for his decision, or perhaps serve as a reminder of the consequences of defying authority. Overall, the work explores themes of duty, intellectual independence, and the conflict between personal ambition and moral conviction.