Pamela Silin-Palmer – lrsSilinPalmerPamela 23Proposals
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The rabbit is adorned with an elaborate floral crown of roses and wears a gown of vibrant pink and gold, accented by a delicate veil. Her posture suggests both grace and a degree of apprehension; her gaze is directed downwards, hinting at uncertainty or perhaps shyness. The bull terrier, conversely, is dressed in a regal doublet and hose, complete with puffed sleeves and decorative trim. His expression is unsettling – a wide, almost manic grin reveals teeth, creating an impression that clashes with the formality of his attire and the overall setting. He holds the rabbit’s hand firmly, his grip appearing somewhat forceful.
The artists use of color contributes significantly to the paintings atmosphere. The pinks and golds associated with the rabbit evoke notions of innocence and beauty, while the darker tones of the background and the bull terrier’s clothing introduce an element of shadow and potential menace. The floral motifs are abundant, both in the rabbit’s headdress and scattered across the ground, suggesting themes of nature, fertility, and perhaps a fragile sense of idyllic harmony.
Subtextually, the work seems to explore power dynamics and societal expectations within relationships. The juxtaposition of the seemingly vulnerable rabbit with the assertive bull terrier raises questions about consent, control, and the potential for imbalance in partnerships. The formal attire suggests adherence to social conventions, yet the unsettling grin on the dog’s face disrupts this facade, hinting at a darker undercurrent beneath the surface of propriety. The painting invites contemplation regarding appearances versus reality, and the complexities inherent in navigating interpersonal relationships within established structures. It is possible that the work functions as a commentary on the performative nature of social rituals and the potential for hidden anxieties to exist even within seemingly harmonious settings.