Childe Frederick Hassam – italian day, may 1918
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Dominating the foreground are numerous flags, arranged in a layered display. These include both national emblems – notably the Stars and Stripes alongside banners bearing green, white, and red – and symbols associated with humanitarian organizations, identifiable by their prominent red crosses. The sheer volume of these flags suggests a demonstration of solidarity or a public expression of patriotism. Their placement obscures much of the architectural detail of the buildings behind them, creating a visual barrier between the viewer and the urban landscape.
The architecture itself is rendered in muted tones, primarily grays and whites, contributing to an atmosphere of subdued grandeur. The buildings appear imposing but indistinct, their details lost within the overall texture of the painting. This lack of specificity reinforces the impression that the focus lies not on the physical location, but rather on the collective sentiment being expressed.
The crowd is largely suggested through a mass of blurred figures in the lower portion of the canvas. Individual identities are subsumed into the throng, emphasizing the communal nature of the event. The brushwork here is particularly loose and gestural, conveying a sense of bustling activity and shared emotion.
Subtly, theres an underlying tension within the scene. While the flags signify unity and celebration, the blurred forms and agitated brushstrokes hint at a potential undercurrent of anxiety or uncertainty. This could be interpreted as reflecting the historical context – a period marked by global conflict and societal upheaval – where public displays of patriotism were often intertwined with anxieties about war and its consequences. The layering of national and humanitarian symbols also suggests a complex interplay between civic duty, international aid, and perhaps even a veiled commentary on the role of nations in times of crisis.