Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1943-1961 – 1956 Femme dans latelier IIII
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To the left, a profile emerges from an array of angular planes; it is difficult to discern definitively as male or female, though the suggestion of hair and facial features hints at a human presence. This figure is not depicted realistically but rather as a collection of shapes and colors – blues, greens, oranges, and blacks dominate, with touches of purple adding visual complexity. The face is fractured, its elements rearranged in a manner that challenges conventional notions of portraiture.
The right side of the painting offers a contrasting element: an arched window or opening revealing a landscape populated by stylized palm trees. This area is bathed in light, creating a sense of depth and distance that contrasts sharply with the compressed space occupied by the figure on the left. The architectural framework surrounding the window is delineated through stark black lines, reinforcing the overall feeling of constructed reality.
A horizontal plane bisects the composition, serving as both a visual anchor and a barrier between the foreground and background. This plane is rendered in orange and red hues, further emphasizing its separation from the cooler tones used elsewhere. The vertical elements on the right side – the window frame and a series of parallel lines – create a sense of enclosure and order that contrasts with the chaotic arrangement of shapes on the left.
The subtexts within this work seem to explore themes of identity, perception, and representation. The fragmented figure suggests a deconstruction of selfhood, questioning the stability of individual identity. The juxtaposition of interior space and exterior landscape implies a tension between confinement and freedom, or perhaps between the subjective experience of reality and an external world. The artist’s deliberate distortion of perspective and form challenges the viewer to actively engage with the work, prompting reflection on the nature of seeing and understanding. Ultimately, the painting resists easy interpretation, inviting multiple readings and emphasizing the inherent ambiguity of human existence.