Rijksmuseum: part 3 – Stap, Jan Woutersz. -- Het kantoor van de rentmeester, 1636
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The seated figure, distinguished by his red cap and dark robes, occupies a central position. His face bears the marks of age – deep wrinkles and a weathered complexion – suggesting experience and perhaps authority. He gestures towards the standing man with one hand, while the other rests on his chest in what could be interpreted as a gesture of reassurance or explanation. The posture conveys a sense of deliberation and engagement.
The standing figure is dressed in somber black attire, his expression serious and somewhat reserved. His hands are clasped together, holding a small, brown bird – likely a sparrow – which he presents towards the seated man. This offering introduces an element of ambiguity; it could signify a gift, a token of respect, or perhaps something more symbolic.
The young boy is notable for his direct gaze and the presence of a live chicken held in his arms. The chicken’s vibrant color contrasts with the muted tones of the surrounding figures clothing, drawing attention to the child. His expression appears somewhat melancholic or apprehensive, creating an intriguing juxtaposition with the seemingly formal interaction between the two adults.
A document lies spread out on the floor at the boy’s feet, covered in dense script that is illegible from this distance. The presence of scattered papers on a shelf behind the standing man further reinforces the setting as one associated with paperwork and administration. A partially visible window suggests an exterior world beyond the confines of the room.
Subtleties within the painting suggest layers of meaning beyond a simple depiction of a meeting. The sparrow, often associated with innocence or vulnerability, held by the seemingly authoritative figure, could be interpreted as a commentary on power dynamics or the burden of responsibility. The boy’s presence and his unusual companion – the chicken – introduce an element of domesticity and perhaps even a touch of whimsy into what might otherwise be perceived as a strictly formal setting. The overall effect is one of quiet observation, inviting contemplation about the relationships between these individuals and the context in which they operate.