Edwin Longsden Long – A question of propriety
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The audience is diverse in age and dress. Several men are seated at a long table, engaged in what seems to be a card game; their expressions range from amusement to mild disapproval. A figure in red, presumably of high status given his attire, sits prominently near the head of the table, observing the dancer with an air of detached scrutiny. To the left, a group of nuns are present, their faces conveying a mixture of discomfort and curiosity. A soldier stands guard near the right edge of the scene, adding to the sense of formality and perhaps hinting at social constraints.
The artist has employed a muted color palette dominated by browns, grays, and reds, which contributes to the overall atmosphere of solemnity and restraint. The checkerboard floor pattern provides visual structure and draws attention towards the dancer’s movements. Above the scene, religious iconography – a crucifix and sculptures – are visible on the walls, creating a palpable tension between the secular entertainment and the spiritual context of the setting.
Subtexts within the painting revolve around themes of propriety, social hierarchy, and the role of women in society. The presence of the nuns suggests a moral judgment being passed upon the dancer’s performance, which might be considered frivolous or immodest by certain segments of the community. The soldiers posture implies an underlying sense of control and surveillance. The card game itself could symbolize the pursuit of pleasure and wealth, contrasting with the piety represented by the religious figures.
The painting seems to explore a moment of cultural collision – the intersection of entertainment, religion, social class, and gender roles – within a specific historical context. It invites contemplation on the boundaries of acceptable behavior and the complexities of human interaction within structured societal frameworks.