Part 3 Prado Museum – Iriarte, Valero -- Don Quijote armado caballero
1720, 54 cm x 78 cm, Lienzo, Óleo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
At the center of this tableau stands a figure clad in full armor, his posture suggesting a mixture of awkwardness and forced dignity. He is surrounded by a group of onlookers – men, women, and children – who regard him with expressions ranging from amusement to polite curiosity. The woman closest to him appears to be offering some form of sustenance, perhaps bread or fruit, while another man stands slightly behind her, holding what seems to be a ceremonial spear.
The composition is carefully structured to draw the viewer’s attention to the armored figure. He occupies a central position, yet his placement within the confined space emphasizes his incongruity with the surroundings. The surrounding individuals are rendered with a degree of realism that contrasts with the somewhat theatrical presentation of the knight. Their clothing and demeanor suggest a rural, working-class background, further highlighting the disparity between their everyday existence and the idealized world of chivalry represented by the armored man.
The presence of the animals – a horse visible on the left side – adds another layer to the narrative. The horse is not adorned or equipped for battle; it appears as a simple work animal, reinforcing the sense that this knight’s aspirations are out of step with reality.
Subtly, the painting seems to explore themes of delusion and social class. The armored figures presence within this mundane setting suggests a disconnect between his self-perception and the perception of those around him. There is an underlying commentary on the absurdity of romantic ideals when confronted with the realities of everyday life. The expressions of the onlookers hint at a gentle mockery, suggesting that they recognize the knight’s folly while simultaneously indulging in his performance. The overall effect is one of quiet irony, inviting contemplation about the nature of dreams, identity, and social expectations.