Part 3 Prado Museum – Velázquez, Diego Rodríguez de Silva y -- El bufón Calabacillas, llamado erróneamente Bobo de Coria
1635 1639, 106 cm x 83 cm, Lienzo, Óleo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Сразу вспоминается старый советский фильм "Дон Кихот". В нём шут говорит: "Есть шутки-желудки, есть намёки на пороки, есть дерзости насчёт женской мерзости! "
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a man with a broad smile, revealing teeth that are not idealized but rendered with a naturalistic quality. His expression is ambiguous; it could suggest amusement, slyness, or perhaps even a touch of melancholy. The eyes hold a certain directness, engaging the viewer in a way that transcends simple portraiture. He wears dark clothing, accented by a large, ornate ruff around his neck – a detail indicative of courtly fashion and suggesting a connection to aristocratic circles despite his apparent profession.
The arrangement of objects surrounding him contributes significantly to the painting’s narrative. A large, polished sphere rests near his left leg, reflecting light and creating a visual echo of his own rounded form. Several other oddly shaped gourds or fruits are clustered on the right side, adding an element of playful absurdity. A glass containing what appears to be wine sits close by, hinting at conviviality and perhaps indulgence. The placement of these items is not random; they seem deliberately arranged to enhance the character’s persona as a performer who provides entertainment through both action and appearance.
The artists use of light and shadow is particularly noteworthy. A strong light source illuminates the figure from the front, highlighting his face and clothing while leaving much of the background in deep shadow. This creates a dramatic effect, isolating him within the composition and emphasizing his presence. The subtle gradations of tone across his skin suggest a keen observation of human anatomy and an ability to capture fleeting expressions.
Subtly, the painting seems to explore themes of social status and performance. While the subject’s attire suggests proximity to the court, his profession as a jester places him outside the realm of true nobility. The work might be interpreted as a commentary on the blurred lines between high and low culture, or an exploration of the role of entertainment in the lives of those who hold power. There is also a sense of quiet dignity conveyed by the subject; despite his seemingly frivolous occupation, he carries himself with a certain self-assuredness that challenges conventional notions of social hierarchy.