European art; part 1 – Albert Gleize - Rug
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a series of interlocking planes that suggest architectural elements or perhaps abstracted landscape features. The forms are not easily identifiable as objects; they function more as visual blocks contributing to the overall pattern. A vertical band on the right side, delineated by stark white lines, acts as a framing device while simultaneously disrupting the perceived unity of the composition.
The artist’s use of texture is noteworthy. Some areas appear smooth and flat, while others exhibit a subtle, woven quality that reinforces the works identity as a textile design. A pattern of small, circular forms – some filled with white dots – appears in the lower left quadrant, adding visual interest and a sense of rhythmic repetition.
Subtly embedded within this abstract arrangement are hints of figurative suggestion. The central grouping of shapes evokes a vaguely human profile, though it is deliberately fragmented and distorted. This ambiguity invites multiple interpretations; the work could be read as an exploration of memory, perception, or the deconstruction of identity. The overall effect is one of controlled chaos – a deliberate disjunction between recognizable forms and conventional representation that challenges the viewer to actively engage with the artwork’s underlying structure. The artist seems interested in exploring the potential for visual harmony within a system of seemingly disparate elements.