Spada, Lionello. Torment of the Apostle Peter Hermitage ~ part 11
Hermitage ~ part 11 – Spada, Lionello. Torment of the Apostle Peter
Edit attribution
Download full size: 1272×1476 px (0,3 Mb)
Back to album: Hermitage ~ part 11
Caravaggio is rightly considered not only the raysmith in the history of artistic development, but also one of the brightest and most talented representatives of such a style of painting and display as the Baroque. A little later it was this style, not without the help of Caravaggio, supplanted by its popularity other, no less popular and known even today styles. Such styles that were able to displace the Baroque include, for example, mannerism.
Description of Caravaggio’s Crucifixion of St. Peter
Caravaggio is rightly considered not only the raysmith in the history of artistic development, but also one of the brightest and most talented representatives of such a style of painting and display as the Baroque. A little later it was this style, not without the help of Caravaggio, supplanted by its popularity other, no less popular and known even today styles.
Such styles that were able to displace the Baroque include, for example, mannerism. Thanks to its features and manner of display, it was able to make a real revolution, first in Rome and then, after that, in the territory of Naples.
What is remarkable is that the artist as a person was very disgusting, so he tried to avoid almost everyone who in one way or another related to his surroundings. And despite his disgusting character, he ranks among the most influential and respected Baroque artists in 17th-century Italy.
He painted his painting, which depicts the crucifixion of St. Peter, specially commissioned by the church in 1601. Along with this he painted Damascus two other paintings. Through these four of his works alone, he became a popular, influential and respected painter of Rome.
Note, not every authority of the churches regarded the works he created as impious and vulgar. But there were also those who did not accept some of his works because of the ugly appearance of the characters.
In the picture the artist most vividly and colorfully portrayed the torments that Peter I had to go through. Peter, according to history, himself insisted that he was crucified from bottom to top, so that the process of crucifixion was not similar to the crucifixion of Christ.
Here, as in almost all works, the artist deprives the viewer of all details if he thinks they are not necessary. That is, it is a dark background, so the focus is on the figure of Peter.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
Surrounding him are several figures engaged in the act of restraint or infliction of suffering. They are rendered with a stark realism, their muscular bodies straining under the effort required to hold the central figure down. The artist has paid particular attention to depicting the physicality of their actions – the tension in their arms and shoulders, the focused intensity in their gazes. One individual leans close to the man’s face, his expression unreadable, while another manipulates a rope or cord that appears to be tightening around the victims extremities.
The lighting is dramatic and theatrical, employing a strong chiaroscuro effect. Deep shadows engulf much of the scene, isolating the figures in pools of light and heightening the sense of claustrophobia and impending doom. The limited palette – dominated by earthy tones of brown, ochre, and red – contributes to the overall atmosphere of grimness and despair.
Beyond the immediate depiction of physical torment, subtexts relating to faith, endurance, and persecution emerge. The aged appearance of the central figure suggests a life lived with conviction, now facing ultimate adversity. His suffering can be interpreted as symbolic of the trials faced by those who adhere to their beliefs in the face of opposition. The presence of multiple figures involved in the act implies a systemic nature to the oppression, suggesting that this is not an isolated incident but part of a larger pattern of persecution.
The composition’s dynamism – the diagonal lines created by the ropes and the straining bodies – further amplify the sense of struggle and unrest. Theres a palpable feeling of immediacy; the viewer feels drawn into the scene as if witnessing the event unfold in real time. The artist has successfully conveyed not only the physical pain but also the psychological weight of suffering, creating a powerful and unsettling image.