the poet zinaida gippius 1906 Leon Bakst
Leon Bakst – the poet zinaida gippius 1906
Edit attribution
Download full size: 766×952 px (0,1 Mb)
Back to album: Leon Bakst
Leon (or "Lev") Samoylovich Bakst was one of the most talented stage designers and artists of the turn of the century. First making his mark in the art association World of Art, where he worked side by side with his friend Alexander Benois, Bakst was rapidly gaining popularity in pictorial circles with his successful graphic sketches, book illustrations, sketches for theatrical productions of many theaters and, of course, his marvelous in their simplicity portraits. Lev Samoylovich constantly existed among the brilliant national intelligentsia - poets, writers, artists - and many of them were destined to remain imprinted by the brush of his talented friend. Zinaida Gippius was no exception.
Description of Leon Bakst’s painting "Portrait of Zinaida Gippius".
Leon (or "Lev") Samoylovich Bakst was one of the most talented stage designers and artists of the turn of the century.
First making his mark in the art association World of Art, where he worked side by side with his friend Alexander Benois, Bakst was rapidly gaining popularity in pictorial circles with his successful graphic sketches, book illustrations, sketches for theatrical productions of many theaters and, of course, his marvelous in their simplicity portraits.
Lev Samoylovich constantly existed among the brilliant national intelligentsia - poets, writers, artists - and many of them were destined to remain imprinted by the brush of his talented friend.
Zinaida Gippius was no exception. The famous poetess, known for her shocking behavior to the entire cultural capital, is depicted by Bakst freely sitting on a chair in an unusual costume. It is an old man’s attire, consisting of pants, a snow-white shirt with a collar and a jacket.
It was impossible for a woman to appear in pants and a man’s jacket at that time - it was not allowed in society. But Gippius breaks stereotypes easily and tastefully, and Bakst skillfully captures her epatastic move in this portrait.
The work is painted in the tradition of Bakst’s best portraits. The artist worked on it in 1906 and coped very quickly. The image of the figure is given in full-length, interesting composition leaves an impression on the viewer. The heroine is positioned in full format, which conventionally stretches her out and the black and white coloring simplifies and emphasizes the line.
Bakst deliberately leaves the background blank, painting in detail the poetess’s face and her costume, which has clearly been emphasized in order to increase the significance of the character’s personality and to show the attention that Gippius always deserved.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The figure’s posture contributes significantly to the overall impression. One leg is casually crossed over the other, while the arm rests against the back of the stool, suggesting an air of relaxed confidence or perhaps even studied nonchalance. The head is turned slightly away from the viewer, and the gaze appears distant, lost in thought.
The color palette is restrained, dominated by dark tones contrasted with the pale skin of the subject and the white shirt. This limited range directs attention to the form and posture rather than vibrant hues. A warm, ochre-toned background provides a neutral backdrop that allows the figure to stand out while also contributing to a sense of intimacy.
The artist’s brushwork is visible throughout, adding texture and dynamism to the composition. The loose application of paint creates a feeling of immediacy and spontaneity, as if capturing a fleeting moment in time.
Subtly, theres an ambiguity regarding gender presentation. While traditionally masculine clothing is worn, certain features – the delicate bone structure, the softness of the hair – introduce a complexity that resists easy categorization. This blurring of lines could be interpreted as a commentary on identity or perhaps a deliberate attempt to challenge conventional notions of masculinity and femininity. The overall effect is one of introspection and quiet contemplation, inviting the viewer to ponder the subject’s inner world.