Arnold Böcklin – War
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Seated within the chariot are two figures: a man wielding a hammer and a female figure whose posture conveys terror and supplication. The man, clad in crimson robes, appears to be actively engaged in the destructive action, his stance suggesting aggression and dominance. The woman’s raised arms and anguished expression evoke vulnerability and helplessness, implying she is a victim of the violence unfolding. Her nudity further emphasizes her exposed state and lack of agency within this tumultuous event.
Below the chariot, a cityscape emerges from the darkness, its buildings rendered in muted tones, suggesting devastation or impending doom. The presence of what appears to be a flag with stripes and stars, partially obscured by the skeletal figure, introduces an element of national identity intertwined with conflict and mortality. A scythe, held aloft by the skeletal form, reinforces this association with death and inevitable loss.
The artist’s use of dramatic lighting contributes significantly to the paintings impact. The figures in the chariot are illuminated against a dark background, intensifying their presence and highlighting the chaos they embody. This stark contrast creates a sense of theatricality, as if the viewer is witnessing a scene from a mythological drama.
Subtexts within the work suggest a commentary on the destructive nature of conflict and its impact on both individuals and society. The combination of human agency (the man with the hammer) and symbolic figures (Death, the allegorical woman) implies that war is not merely a consequence of individual actions but also an inevitable force driven by deeper, perhaps uncontrollable, powers. The depiction of national symbols alongside death further questions the glorification of warfare and its purported benefits, instead presenting it as a source of suffering and ruin. Ultimately, the painting conveys a profound sense of dread and despair, leaving the viewer to contemplate the devastating consequences of violence.