Part 6 Prado Museum – Bruegel el Viejo, Pieter -- El vino de la fiesta de San Martín
1565 1568, 148 cm x 270,5 cm, Lienzo, Temple de cola.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The central mass of people is densely packed, with individuals engaged in various activities – some appear to be dancing or celebrating, others seem to be struggling or being restrained. The artist has rendered these figures with a remarkable level of detail, capturing individual expressions and gestures that contribute to the overall sense of frenetic activity. A distinct lack of clear hierarchy or leadership is evident; theres no focal point beyond the initial fallen figure, suggesting a breakdown of social order.
The background provides a contrasting element of relative calm. A distant building, possibly a tower or church, rises above the landscape, hinting at a societal structure that seems detached from the turmoil below. The muted tones and atmospheric perspective used in depicting this backdrop create a sense of distance and perhaps even indifference to the events unfolding in the foreground.
The presence of a rider on horseback further complicates the narrative. This figure, positioned slightly apart from the main group, appears to be observing the scene with an ambiguous expression – is it one of authority, concern, or detached amusement? The dog at his feet adds another layer of detail and potential symbolism.
Subtextually, the painting seems to explore themes of societal excess, the fragility of order, and the potential for chaos to erupt even within seemingly stable communities. The contrast between the vibrant activity in the foreground and the distant, stoic background suggests a commentary on the disconnect between individual experience and broader social structures. The fallen figure could represent vulnerability or consequence, while the rider might symbolize power or observation from a position of privilege. Overall, the work evokes a feeling of unease and invites contemplation about the nature of human behavior and the precariousness of societal harmony.