Part 6 Prado Museum – Meifrén Roig, Eliseo -- Plaza de París
1887, 108 cm x 62 cm, Lienzo, Óleo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see three figures seated at tables beneath the awning. Two men are positioned on the left side, one engrossed in reading a newspaper, his posture suggesting quiet contemplation. A third figure, a woman wearing an elaborate hat adorned with feathers, occupies the central table. She is turned slightly away from the viewer, her gaze directed towards something beyond the frame. To her right sits another man, also facing outwards, seemingly absorbed in his own thoughts. The arrangement of these individuals suggests a sense of detached observation rather than active engagement within the public space.
The plaza itself is filled with activity: pedestrians stroll along the sidewalks, bicycles are scattered about, and buildings line the perimeter, their architectural details rendered with meticulous precision. A monumental structure, likely a commemorative statue or monument, occupies the central axis of the square, drawing the eye towards the distant horizon. The light appears to be diffused, creating a soft atmosphere that softens the edges of the scene.
The artist’s use of chiaroscuro is notable; the foreground is sharply illuminated by the awnings light, while the background recedes into shadow and atmospheric haze. This technique emphasizes the separation between the intimate space of the café and the expansive public realm. The still life on the table – glasses of wine, a bottle, and a small black cat – adds a touch of domesticity to the scene, contrasting with the dynamism of the plaza beyond.
Subtly, the painting conveys a sense of urban alienation or quiet melancholy. The figures appear isolated within their own thoughts, seemingly disconnected from the activity around them. The awning acts as both a physical and metaphorical barrier, separating the individuals from the public sphere. This creates an atmosphere of introspection and detachment, suggesting a commentary on the anonymity and solitude that can exist even in densely populated urban environments. The presence of the cat, a symbol often associated with domesticity and comfort, further reinforces this sense of quiet refuge amidst the bustle of city life.