Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1962-1973 – 1966 VВnus foraine
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To the left, a procession unfolds. A figure astride an animal – likely a horse or donkey – plays a flute. The musician’s posture is somewhat awkward, his body angled in a way that disrupts any sense of naturalism. He seems to be leading a smaller figure seated on the animals back; this individual is clad in elaborate attire, suggesting a position of status or authority.
Beneath them, clustered near the lower right corner, are several small, crouching figures. Their forms are distorted and simplified, their expressions difficult to discern. They appear almost like spectators, observing the unfolding scene with an ambiguous mixture of curiosity and apprehension. The artist has used rapid, gestural lines to convey a sense of movement and energy within this group.
The background is rendered as a dark, swirling mass, obscuring any clear spatial context. This lack of depth contributes to the dreamlike quality of the image, blurring the boundaries between reality and fantasy. A cluster of radiating lines emanates from behind the female figure on the right, resembling a burst of light or energy. It could be interpreted as a symbolic representation of divine presence or inspiration.
The work seems to explore themes of spectacle, performance, and the relationship between beauty, power, and vulnerability. The juxtaposition of classical allusions with distorted figures and unsettling poses creates a sense of unease and ambiguity. Theres an underlying tension between the idealized portrayal of the female figure and the chaotic energy of the surrounding scene. The presence of the animal – a creature often associated with both labor and folly – adds another layer of complexity, suggesting a commentary on human nature and societal structures. Ultimately, the etching resists easy interpretation, inviting viewers to engage in their own subjective readings of its symbolic language.