часть 2 - Russian and soviet artists Русские и советские художники – Подвиг молодого киевлянина при осаде Киева печенегами в 968 году Около 1810
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 25 Ответы
пожалуйста
сочинение!!!!
сочинение!!!
нужно сочинение! а не картину.
Где???
пишите сами! неучи!
мне не помогло
Here is an essay: The painting by the artist Andrei Ivanovich Ivanov was created during a period of upsurge in the patriotic movement in Russian society. The date of creation of the painting is 1810. In society, there was a readiness for historical plots on national themes, with particular interest in its own past and its heroic pages. The artist took an episode from Nestors chronicle as the basis for the plot, telling about the siege of Kiev by the Pechenegs in 968 and about a clever young man who managed to pass through the enemy horde and call for help. A thousand years later, it is difficult to establish the truthfulness of the existence of such a hero, but this chronicle young man inspired not only Ivanov to create a monumental canvas, but also other poets and writers.
The painting is done in the style of classicism. In the center of the composition is the figure of a naked young man. The artist uses the technique of highlighting the main character with light in order to contrast him with the dark forces of the Pechenegs. The body of the young man is depicted in the traditions of ancient heroes: classical proportions, developed musculature, and a characteristic turn of the head. The young man runs barefoot to the Dnieper, clutching a bridle in his hands. According to legend, he knows the language of the Pechenegs and, making his way through the army, is looking for his lost horse. His goal is to swim across the Dnieper and call for help from the troops of allies.
We see a young Kievite in motion, he has already reached the river, escaping from an enemy arrow. At his feet lies a dying Pecheneg, clutching a broken end of an arrow in his death throes. The face of the enemy is exaggerated: a wide, bony face, dark skin, and untidy beard. In contrast to him is the face of the Kievite: delicate features, smooth, clean skin, and a high forehead. The artist ennobled the appearance of the young man performing an important mission. His body is naked not by chance; this technique performs an important artistic task: it makes the hero defenseless and vulnerable against the formidable weapons and armor of the enemy, thereby evoking empathy for the unarmed hero in the viewer. The artist conveys to us the idea that a true hero cannot be stopped; there are no obstacles for him when he must fulfill his duty to his native city.
Обращаюсь к виктории!!! я знаю откуда ты взяла ответ!!!
Круто
хорошая картина
Неучи пишите сами мне не помогло сама сделала это легко!
Спасибо.
И сами вы неучи, Настя, написала бы своё имя нормально. Ужас, не каждые такие неучи, просто не могут.
Виктория, спаибо
хватит ругаться достали! других обзывательств даже не знаете!!!
Виктория спасибо за сочинение! очень помогло!
Виктории спасибо!
что за
а поменьше
большое СССПППАААСССИИИБББООО
класс
очень много.
очень много и почти некоторое ненужно
имбицылы
мне помогло и писал я сам в отличии от вас
You cannot comment Why?
Beneath him lies another figure, clad in armor, fallen prone upon the ground. The posture of this individual indicates defeat and vulnerability; the helmet has shifted, partially obscuring the face, contributing to an overall sense of helplessness. A scattering of weaponry – spears and what appears to be a sword – lies near the fallen warrior, further emphasizing his subjugation.
The background is populated with additional figures on horseback, positioned at a distance but clearly engaged in the same conflict. Their presence establishes the context as a military engagement, likely an assault or siege. The landscape itself is rugged and uneven, characterized by rocky terrain and dense foliage, contributing to the overall atmosphere of peril and struggle. A fortified structure can be discerned in the far background, suggesting a besieged settlement.
The artist’s use of light and shadow enhances the dramatic impact of the scene. The central figure is illuminated, drawing immediate attention to his actions, while the fallen warrior remains largely shrouded in darkness. This contrast reinforces the dichotomy between triumph and defeat, action and consequence.
Subtleties within the work suggest a deliberate attempt to elevate the narrative beyond a simple depiction of battle. The unclothed state of the central figure evokes classical heroic imagery, aligning him with figures from mythology or ancient history. This association imbues his actions with a sense of timeless virtue and courage. Furthermore, the composition’s emphasis on individual heroism within a larger conflict hints at themes of sacrifice and resilience in the face of adversity. The artist seems to be exploring not just the events of a battle but also the moral implications of bravery and loss.