William Marlow – St. Pauls and Blackfriars Bridge, London
c.1770-2 oil on canvas
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The dome, centrally positioned, commands immediate attention due to its size and architectural grandeur. Its presence suggests civic importance and perhaps religious authority within this urban setting. The bridge, a prominent feature traversing the river, appears robust and functional, indicative of engineering prowess and facilitating connection across the waterway. Several small boats populate the rivers surface, some carrying passengers, suggesting active transportation and commerce along the water route.
Along the right edge of the painting, a modest structure – likely a boathouse or storage shed – is depicted, anchoring the scene with a touch of everyday life. A sail is visible, hinting at maritime activity beyond whats immediately apparent on the river’s surface. The sky occupies a significant portion of the upper register and displays a diffused light, punctuated by scattered cloud formations that contribute to the overall atmospheric effect.
The artist appears to have prioritized capturing the essence of this place rather than meticulous detail. The brushwork is relatively loose, contributing to an impressionistic quality in the rendering of buildings and landscape elements. This approach allows for a focus on the interplay of light and shadow across the scene, enhancing its visual appeal.
Subtly embedded within the composition are suggestions of Londons burgeoning industrial age. While not overtly emphasized, the bridge’s construction and the presence of boats imply an economy reliant on trade and transportation. The sheer density of buildings speaks to a growing population and urban expansion. The painting doesnt offer overt commentary but rather presents a visual record of a city in transition – a place defined by its architectural landmarks, waterways, and burgeoning commercial activity.