Rijksmuseum: part 4 – Tengnagel, Jan -- Officieren en andere schutters van wijk XI in Amsterdam, 1613
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Each man is rendered with meticulous realism; individual features – the texture of skin, the glint in eyes, the precise folds of clothing – are carefully observed and reproduced. A significant element of the work lies in the elaborate ruffs that adorn each figure’s neck. These are not merely decorative; they serve as markers of status and wealth, emphasizing the groups social standing. The varying degrees of detail applied to these ruffs further differentiate individuals within the collective portrait.
The men display a range of expressions, from solemn contemplation to jovial engagement. Some hold goblets aloft in what might be a toast, while others gaze directly at the viewer with an air of self-assuredness. A palpable sense of camaraderie and shared identity permeates the scene. The presence of weaponry – a sword prominently displayed on the right side of the canvas – hints at a military or civic guard function for these men, suggesting they represent a collective responsibility to protect their community.
The arrangement is hierarchical; certain figures are positioned more centrally, indicating potential leadership roles within the group. A banner draped over the shoulder of one man introduces an element of symbolic representation, though its specific meaning remains ambiguous without further contextual information. The lighting is dramatic, with strong contrasts between light and shadow that accentuate facial features and create a sense of depth.
Beyond the surface depiction of a celebratory gathering, subtexts relating to civic duty, social status, and collective identity emerge. The painting serves not only as a record of individual likenesses but also as a visual assertion of group cohesion and societal importance. It is likely intended to project an image of strength, prosperity, and communal responsibility within the context of its original commission.