Rijksmuseum: part 4 – Unknown artist -- Satire op het celibaat, 1600-1649
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To the right stands a man adorned in elaborate ecclesiastical vestments – a mitre and flowing robes – his expression one of apparent amusement or complicity. He is positioned slightly outside the immediate intimacy of the other two figures, observing them with what seems to be knowing approval. The light catches his face, highlighting wrinkles that suggest age and experience, further reinforcing a sense of detached observation.
At the foot of the bed, scattered across the floor, are miniature figurines – doll-like representations of human forms – lying in disarray. These small figures contribute significantly to the painting’s allegorical nature. Their presence suggests a commentary on societal norms or perhaps a mocking representation of innocence lost or corrupted.
The overall atmosphere is one of secrecy and transgression. The darkness enveloping the scene reinforces the illicit nature of the depicted activity, while the candles light serves as both illumination and a spotlight on the central figures. The artist placed the ecclesiastical figure strategically to imply an endorsement or at least a tolerance of the actions taking place.
The painting’s subtext likely revolves around satire – specifically, a critique of clerical celibacy and the hypocrisy that might accompany it. It is probable that the work was intended as a commentary on the perceived failings within religious institutions during the period in which it was created. The diminutive figures scattered at the base of the bed could symbolize the trivialization or degradation of spiritual values.