borisov-musatov requiem 1905 Viktor Borisov-Musatov (1870-1905)
Viktor Borisov-Musatov – borisov-musatov requiem 1905
Edit attribution
Download full size: 1017×690 px (0,1 Mb)
Painter: Viktor Borisov-Musatov
Another painting by Borisov-Musatov, Requiem, continues the ideas begun in The Emerald Necklace. Huge, elaborated to the finest detail easel watercolor, it was dedicated to the tragic death of the artist’s close friend, N.Y. Stanyukovich. The artist was incredibly grieved for the beautiful and close to him person. The grief caused by such an unexpected death was expressed in the portrayal of "Requiem".
Description of Victor Borisov Musatov’s painting Requiem
Another painting by Borisov-Musatov, Requiem, continues the ideas begun in The Emerald Necklace. Huge, elaborated to the finest detail easel watercolor, it was dedicated to the tragic death of the artist’s close friend, N.Y. Stanyukovich.
The artist was incredibly grieved for the beautiful and close to him person. The grief caused by such an unexpected death was expressed in the portrayal of "Requiem". The entire painting is in keeping with the classical style and forms. The carefully drawn details, however, did not help the artist bring the characters of the painting to life. The women are all depicted flatly, as if they were shadows of terrible sorrow and despair.
The building and park depicted behind, just as in "The Necklace," acts more as a backdrop than a three-dimensional space. Despite the theme of sadness and grief, as well as the pessimistic mood, the author prefers light colors and shades. They move smoothly from the walls of the building, to the costumes and outfits of the women, the light tiles, as well as the appearance of the ancient statue.
In his work, the artist Borisov-Musatov was able to replace the living characters with symbols, and thus unusually close to symbolism, in the image of mysticism. The author painted his picture in the small town of Tarus, located on the shore of the river Oka. There the artist spent from March to November 1905. He was not interested in the public and all the events that took place there, if they touched his creative interests.
However, being in the silence of the ordinary village, where rumors of protests, peasant strikes and unrest hardly reached him, he looked forward to new newspapers, as well as the arrival of the "Russian Republic".
All of these events resonated with the artist’s work. It was in this year that he begins to work on landscapes that represent in his understanding the appearance of the new Russia of the Republic.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a procession of figures, all women, dressed in long, flowing gowns. Their attire suggests a degree of formality, yet the garments appear faded and worn, hinting at a decline or loss of former grandeur. The women’s faces are characterized by a pervasive sadness; their expressions range from quiet grief to vacant contemplation. They seem united in their sorrow, but there is no overt display of emotion – rather, a collective sense of subdued mourning prevails.
The arrangement of the figures is significant. They are clustered together, forming a tight group that reinforces the feeling of shared experience and communal suffering. The positioning suggests a ritualistic or ceremonial aspect to their gathering; they might be attending a funeral or commemorating a loss. A figure on the left stands slightly apart from the main group, her posture suggesting either grief or detachment.
The background is indistinct, with blurred architectural elements and foliage that further emphasize the focus on the women’s expressions of sorrow. The lack of clear spatial definition contributes to the dreamlike quality of the scene, blurring the boundaries between reality and memory. A sense of decay permeates the image; the colors are washed out, and the forms appear softened, as if viewed through a veil of time or sadness.
Subtly, there is an implication of societal decline or loss. The women’s attire, while elegant in design, appears neglected, suggesting a fading aristocracy or a lost way of life. The overall mood evokes themes of mourning, memory, and the passage of time – a poignant reflection on loss and the fragility of existence.