Jean-Léon Gérôme – Phryne before the Areopagus
1861, 80х128
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 3 Ответы
ах...
Совершенное тело не может скрывать несовершенную душу.
Какая же интересная личность была Фрина
Жером безумно любил сюжет выставления обнажённой женщины перед толпой. На эту тему он написал несколько картин, только названия менял.
You cannot comment Why?
The scene is set in an austere, classical interior, likely a temple or courtroom, with columns and a frieze-like decoration above the seated judges. The judges themselves are depicted wearing red robes and seated on tiered benches, their faces a mix of awe, shock, and contemplation. Their varied reactions – some covering their eyes, others leaning forward, some gesturing, and others appearing stunned – highlight the dramatic impact of Phrynes unveiling.
Phryne stands center-stage, her body illuminated, her hands covering her face in a gesture that is both modest and alluring. Her pose and the soft lighting emphasize her idealized beauty, aiming to suggest divine favor. To her left, a man in a blue robe, presumably Hypereides, has just finished drawing back a light blue drape, revealing her to the court. Two figures in darker robes are partially visible to his left, seated and seemingly observing the scene.
The subtexts of the painting are rich and multifaceted. Firstly, it plays on the classical ideal of beauty and its potential power to influence, even to the point of absolving guilt. It explores the tension between law and beauty, reason and emotion, and human judgment versus divine inspiration. Phrynes nudity can be interpreted as an act of vulnerability, but also as bold self-presentation, an appeal to a higher, more aesthetic, or even sensual form of justice. The painting also touches upon themes of accusation, defense, and the nature of truth in the face of overwhelming aesthetic experience. The scene can be seen as a commentary on the power of rhetoric and spectacle in shaping perception and outcomes, even within a formal judicial setting. It also reflects the eras fascination with ancient Greece and its philosophical and artistic ideals, often reinterpreted through a more romantic and dramatic lens.