Jean-Léon Gérôme – Une plaisanterie (Arnaute fumant au nez d un chien/Un lévrier qui n aime pas le tabac)
60х73
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Informative picture.
Jérôme was a successful artist, and many of his works are in the Hermitage Museum. But now, when those times have become part of art history for us, we understand how far behind his time he was. Just think, he outlived Van Gogh by almost 15 years, Toulouse-Lautrec by 4 years, he was only 10 years older than Degas and 8 years older than Claude Monet. And yet, Henri Murger published Scenes from Bohemian Life when Jérôme was just 27 years old.
Delacroix appears more modern, despite being a quarter of a century older.
But towards the end of his life, Jérôme reinvented himself and learned almost all the techniques of Modernism.
You cannot comment Why?
The setting itself contributes significantly to the overall effect. Walls adorned with intricate blue and white tilework create a sense of luxury and exoticism. A partially visible door, framed by more decorative tiles, suggests access to other rooms within this dwelling. The light source appears to originate from the left, illuminating the figures and highlighting the textures of their clothing and the surrounding environment. A small table beside the man holds several ornate metal vessels, further emphasizing the richness of the surroundings.
The central narrative revolves around a playful, albeit potentially disruptive, interaction between the man and the dog. The act of directing smoke towards the animal’s face is presented as a jest, an attempt at amusement that elicits an unfavorable reaction from the greyhound. This dynamic introduces a subtext concerning power dynamics and cultural differences. The mans confident posture and elaborate clothing suggest a position of authority or privilege, while the dog’s discomfort highlights a potential clash between customs or sensibilities.
The artist has skillfully employed detail to convey both the visual richness of the setting and the nuanced emotions of the subjects. The rendering of the dog’s fur, the folds in the mans clothing, and the intricate patterns on the tiles all contribute to a sense of realism while simultaneously reinforcing the exotic nature of the scene. The painting invites contemplation about humor, cultural boundaries, and the complexities of human-animal relationships within a context of perceived otherness.