Pestel – interior (family at the table) 1920-1
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The adult figure in the center commands attention through their posture and placement. They are seated rigidly, hands clasped, with an elongated face and a gaze directed downwards, suggesting introspection or perhaps melancholy. The other adult, partially obscured on the left side of the frame, appears to be engaged in some activity, though details remain indistinct due to the limited visibility. A child sits at the opposite end of the table, their features similarly simplified and somewhat detached from the overall scene.
The tabletop is laden with objects – a large red bowl or vessel, several pitchers, and cups – arranged without a clear sense of order. These items contribute to the feeling of stillness and quietude that pervades the image. The background consists of a long, reddish-brown sofa against which the figures are seated, and a wall adorned with framed pictures and a circular mirror. This backdrop is rendered in broad strokes, lacking detail and further emphasizing the flatness of the pictorial space.
The painting’s subtexts revolve around themes of familial connection and emotional distance. The rigid postures and averted gazes suggest an underlying tension or lack of genuine interaction between the figures. The simplified forms and muted colors contribute to a sense of alienation and psychological restraint. The objects on the table, while ostensibly domestic, seem almost symbolic – representing perhaps the rituals and routines that define family life, yet failing to foster warmth or intimacy.
The deliberate avoidance of naturalistic representation and the emphasis on geometric shapes suggest an interest in exploring emotional states rather than depicting a literal scene. It is possible to interpret this work as a commentary on the complexities of familial relationships within a specific historical context – a time marked by social upheaval and psychological introspection. The overall effect is one of quiet contemplation, tinged with a sense of melancholy and unspoken anxieties.