Durer Engravings – Justice, Truth and Reason in the Stocks with the Seated Judge and Sleeping Piety
1526 Woodcut VNG
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a man, presumably the judge, positioned centrally and elevated above the others. He wears elaborate robes and a beard, suggesting authority and age. His posture is rigid, his gaze directed downwards towards those in confinement. To his right sits a woman with an ornate headdress; her languid pose and closed eyes suggest sleep or indifference, potentially representing Piety or Faith.
Three figures are confined within what appears to be a stockade – a wooden structure used for public shaming or punishment. The central figure is bound and appears to be undergoing some form of examination by the judge, who holds an object resembling a staff or rod. To his left sits another man, also restrained, with a posture suggesting resignation or despair. On the right, a third individual seems to be in a state of prostration, possibly indicating submission or penitence.
The artist employed a stark contrast between light and shadow, enhancing the dramatic effect and emphasizing the figures’ expressions and postures. The limited color palette contributes to the overall somber mood. The architectural setting is rudimentary, suggesting a public space rather than an official courtroom.
Subtexts within this engraving are layered and potentially critical. The depiction of Piety as asleep or indifferent raises questions about the relationship between faith and justice. The judge’s actions, coupled with the bound figures varied responses, suggest themes of power, accountability, and perhaps even abuse of authority. The use of a stockade implies a public spectacle, highlighting the performative nature of justice and its potential for manipulation. The overall impression is one of moral ambiguity, prompting viewers to question the fairness and impartiality of the judicial process represented. The engraving seems to be less about literal depiction and more about conveying a commentary on societal structures and their inherent flaws.