На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has rendered the objects with a meticulous attention to detail; the textures of the fruit skins, the sheen on the nuts, and the individual feathers of the parrot are all carefully observed and reproduced. Light falls across the scene from an unseen source, creating highlights and shadows that contribute to the illusion of three-dimensionality. A single fly hovers near the apple, adding a touch of realism and subtly hinting at decay.
The arrangement itself seems deliberately staged. The abundance of food suggests themes of prosperity and indulgence. However, the presence of the parrot introduces an element of potential disruption or temptation. Parrots were often symbols of exoticism and luxury in European art, but also carried connotations of vanity and a desire for what is unattainable. Its proximity to the fruit could be interpreted as a commentary on human desires and the fleeting nature of pleasure. The fly further reinforces this sense of transience; it serves as a reminder that even abundance is subject to deterioration.
The overall effect is one of quiet contemplation, inviting viewers to consider not only the beauty of the individual objects but also the deeper symbolic meanings embedded within the composition. Theres an underlying tension between the promise of sustenance and the inevitability of loss, conveyed through the careful juxtaposition of vibrant life and subtle signs of decay.