На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artists meticulous rendering of light and shadow contributes to a heightened realism. The glossy sheen of the citrus fruits, the reflective surface beneath them, and the translucence of the glass all demonstrate a mastery of technique. This attention to detail extends to the depiction of the parrot’s plumage and the mouse’s fur, which are rendered with remarkable precision.
Beyond the purely visual elements, the painting carries several layers of symbolic meaning typical of vanitas still lifes. The presence of the mouse suggests vulnerability and the destructive forces of nature, hinting at the fleetingness of earthly possessions. Similarly, the parrot, often associated with vanity and mimicry, could be interpreted as a commentary on human folly or superficiality. The decaying citrus peels and scattered nuts reinforce this theme of transience and the inevitable decline of all things. Even the glass goblet, seemingly pristine, is ultimately fragile and susceptible to breakage.
The overall effect is one of opulent abundance juxtaposed with an underlying awareness of mortality and decay – a common motif in art intended to provoke contemplation on the ephemeral nature of life and the importance of spiritual values. The inclusion of insects further emphasizes this theme, reminding the viewer that even seemingly perfect compositions are subject to natural processes of decomposition.