На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The background is equally fragmented, with trees and hills appearing as geometric shapes layered upon one another. The landscape seems to undulate and shift, creating a sense of instability and dreamlike disorientation. Theres an absence of traditional perspective; depth is suggested through color saturation and overlapping forms rather than linear recession. A distant horizon line, rendered in muted tones, provides a vague indication of spatial extent but does not establish a clear vanishing point.
The artist’s use of color contributes significantly to the painting’s overall effect. Greens are prevalent, but they range from acidic yellows to deep olives, creating a complex and unsettling visual texture. The animals themselves are painted in unnatural colors – the white horse is tinged with blue, the chestnut with pink – which further enhances the sense of unreality.
Subtly, theres an underlying tension within this seemingly idyllic scene. While the presence of horses suggests themes of nature, freedom, and rural life, their distorted forms and the chaotic arrangement of the landscape hint at a deeper unease. The density of the composition, with its overlapping figures and fractured planes, creates a feeling of confinement rather than expansiveness. It is possible to interpret this as an expression of anxieties related to societal disruption or a questioning of traditional notions of harmony and order. The painting doesnt offer a straightforward narrative but instead evokes a mood – one of vibrant yet unsettling transformation.