Hendrick van Balen – The Judgment of Paris
1600
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Why did artists of that era depict ancient heroes so unlike their actual ancient counterparts? What is with the added weight? And what about those, frankly, ordinary faces? Its as if an artist would wake up in the morning, yawn, look out the window, see three townswomen, and sketch them to create medieval-style depictions of Athena or Aphrodite. What kind of tradition is that? To fill timeless images with the likenesses of their contemporaries. Perhaps they were painting for their own time, so there would be no confusion. I fear sounding ignorant about the art of those years, but thats how it appears to me, and its quite sad. Now, a specialist would probably tell me that I dont understand anything. Look at ancient Greek sculpture: its captivating, awe-inspiring, with harmonious lines and expressive gazes! And this? Its pitiful. At least lets compare sculpture and painting.
You cannot comment Why?
The three women present themselves as distinct entities, each embodying different qualities through their attire and posture. One stands partially veiled, her form accentuated by a shield held at her side; another is adorned in flowing red drapery, while the third appears entirely nude, her body turned slightly towards the viewer. The artist has rendered the flesh tones with considerable attention to detail, emphasizing the idealized beauty of each figure.
Above them, a group of winged figures – presumably cherubs – flit about, one holding what seems to be an apple. Their presence introduces a sense of divine observation and judgment into the scene. A small owl sits at the feet of the nude woman, a detail that carries symbolic weight, often associated with wisdom or foresight, though here it might also suggest folly or naivete.
The arrangement suggests a moment of deliberation or decision-making. The young man’s gaze is directed towards the women, implying he is tasked with evaluating them in some way. The differing presentations of the women – the veiled modesty, the opulent drapery, and the unadorned vulnerability – hint at competing values or ideals being presented for consideration.
The landscape itself contributes to the overall meaning. The dense foliage creates a sense of enclosure and intimacy, while the distant mountains suggest a broader context beyond the immediate scene. This combination reinforces the idea that this is not merely a personal encounter but one with implications extending far beyond those directly involved. The light, diffused and warm, lends an air of timelessness to the event, elevating it from a simple narrative to something more allegorical or symbolic.