На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist positioned the pheasant slightly off-center, allowing space for a gnarled branch of what appears to be a plum tree to occupy the lower right quadrant. This branch is bare, its form twisting and reaching towards the upper left corner of the composition. The starkness of the branches contrasts with the vibrancy of the bird’s coloration, drawing attention to both elements simultaneously.
The background is ambiguous; it isnt clearly defined as a landscape but rather appears as a wash of color that fades into indistinct shapes. This lack of specificity contributes to an atmosphere of ethereal distance and emphasizes the subject matter – the pheasant and the branch – as isolated entities within their environment.
In the lower left corner, there is a small inscription in what seems to be Japanese calligraphy. Its presence suggests a personal connection or commentary by the artist, though its meaning remains inaccessible without translation. The inclusion of this script reinforces the work’s cultural context.
Subtly, the painting evokes themes of resilience and fleeting beauty. The pheasants flight can be interpreted as a symbol of aspiration or freedom, while the bare plum branch might represent endurance through adversity – a common motif in East Asian art. The overall effect is one of contemplative observation, inviting the viewer to consider the delicate balance between life and stillness, movement and permanence.