Edvard Munch – img723
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 8 Ответы
THE MURDER OF MARAT
With his head wrapped in a towel,
He emerges from the bath, dripping wet.
Blood splashes in the tub like a wave,
Spreading across the stone floor,
Diluted by hot water.
There he is – the murdered orator,
Who promised happiness to the crowds.
A torrent of blood gushed forth.
And for many, many moons,
History will preserve
The name of Marats murderer.
Evil is excessively rich,
Unlike Aonid.
Damn, if this is a painting about losing ones virginity, why so much blood? It makes no sense...
By the way, Munch often depicted vampires in his paintings. Perhaps she killed this man in this painting as well.
If she killed him, then why isnt the blood near the man, but on the corner of the sofa? The artist is just a neurotic.
Does this painting have a title?
The little Charlotte Corday stabbed Marat. Marat strangely resembles Stalin.
Marat was actually stabbed in the bathtub. So, the theory about the vampire is more likely.
What a murder! Dont you see, shes just having her period.
You cannot comment Why?
To her left lies a prone figure, seemingly lifeless. The body is depicted in muted earth tones and blues, suggesting decay or exhaustion. A large area of crimson staining the bedding around the fallen individual immediately signals violence or trauma. This visual element introduces an undeniable sense of tragedy and loss.
The background is rendered as a swirling mass of dark greens and browns, creating a claustrophobic atmosphere that presses in on the figures. The brushwork here is loose and agitated, contributing to the overall feeling of unease. A small, dark object – possibly a bowl or container – sits near the standing woman, containing what appear to be oranges or similar fruit. This detail introduces a jarring note of domesticity amidst the surrounding chaos; it could symbolize lost innocence, unrealized potential, or a desperate clinging to normalcy in the face of devastation.
The painting’s subtexts revolve around themes of mortality, grief, and perhaps even complicity. The womans ambiguous stance – neither actively mourning nor demonstrably distressed – suggests a complex emotional state. Is she a witness? A participant? Her nudity could be interpreted as symbolic of vulnerability or exposure to the harsh realities of existence. The juxtaposition of life and death is not presented in a straightforward narrative; rather, it invites contemplation on the fragility of human existence and the psychological toll of trauma. The overall effect is one of profound emotional weight, leaving the viewer with a lingering sense of disquiet and unanswered questions.