На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition presents a fragmented depiction of what appears to be a chair, rendered in a style characterized by geometric abstraction and multiple perspectives. The artist dismantled the objects form into angular planes and facets, rearranging them within the picture plane without adhering to traditional notions of spatial coherence.
A dominant palette of browns, blacks, whites, and a striking turquoise blue defines the visual field. These colors are not applied uniformly; instead, they interact through sharp contrasts and subtle gradations, contributing to the overall sense of fractured reality. The turquoise patch introduces an unexpected element, disrupting the otherwise earthy tones and drawing attention to its central placement within the chair’s structure.
The arrangement of shapes suggests a simultaneous viewing from several angles. One can discern elements that resemble the backrest, seat, and legs, yet these components are not presented in their entirety or in a logically connected manner. Instead, they overlap and intersect, creating an illusion of depth while simultaneously flattening the image surface.
There is a deliberate absence of traditional perspective cues – no vanishing point, no consistent light source. This contributes to a sense of disorientation and challenges the viewers expectation of representational accuracy. The artist seems less interested in depicting the chair as it is than in exploring its constituent forms and their potential for reconfiguration.
Subtly embedded within this deconstruction is an exploration of perception itself. By dismantling a familiar object, the author invites contemplation on how we construct meaning through visual information. The fragmented nature of the representation might also be interpreted as a reflection of a world undergoing rapid change or societal disruption – a sense of instability conveyed through the breakdown of established forms. Ultimately, the work is not about the chair itself but rather about the process of seeing and understanding.