Ernest Lawson – Berkshire Hills 1931
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a layered arrangement of forms. In the foreground, a dark expanse – likely water or shadow – occupies the lower portion of the painting, its surface reflecting the muted light above. Beyond this lies a series of undulating hills, rendered in earthy tones of brown, ochre, and russet. These hues are punctuated by patches of darker green suggesting vegetation clinging to the slopes. The artist has not delineated these forms with sharp outlines; instead, they blend into one another, creating a sense of atmospheric perspective and visual unity.
Further back, the hills rise in prominence, culminating in a range of higher peaks partially obscured by cloud cover. These distant heights are painted in cooler tones – grays, blues, and purples – further enhancing the illusion of depth. A small structure, possibly a house or farmhouse, is nestled within one of the valleys, appearing almost insignificant against the vastness of the landscape.
The sky itself is not depicted as a uniform expanse but rather as a swirling mass of clouds, painted with short, agitated brushstrokes. The light filtering through these clouds creates a diffused illumination that softens the edges of the hills and contributes to the painting’s overall mood of quiet contemplation.
Subtly, the work suggests an exploration of the relationship between humanity and nature. The small dwelling nestled within the landscape implies human presence, yet it is dwarfed by the scale of the natural world. This juxtaposition hints at themes of isolation, resilience, and the enduring power of the environment. The lack of clear definition in the forms also invites a sense of ambiguity; the viewer is left to interpret the scene based on their own experiences and perceptions. The painting’s strength lies not in its precise representation but in its ability to evoke a feeling – a sense of quiet grandeur and the subtle beauty of an untouched landscape.