Édouard Manet – Bullfight
1865. 90x110
Location: Orsay Museum (Musée d’Orsay), Paris.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The arena floor itself is rendered with broad strokes of ochre and brown, suggesting dust and heat – elements intrinsic to this spectacle. The bull, powerfully built and seemingly enraged, occupies a significant portion of the foreground. It appears to be in motion, its body contorted as if attempting to escape or retaliate against its tormentors.
Several figures are positioned around the bull. One man, mounted on horseback, wields a lance with apparent precision; his posture suggests both control and calculated risk. Other individuals, dressed in traditional attire – vibrant green and red jackets contrasting sharply with the muted tones of the arena – appear to be maneuvering strategically, attempting to guide or distract the animal. A fallen figure lies prone near the bull’s hooves, adding a layer of immediate peril and potential tragedy to the scene.
The background is less detailed; the tiered seating is depicted as a mass of indistinct forms, hinting at a large audience observing the event. The sky above is rendered in muted blues and oranges, contributing to the overall atmosphere of tension and drama.
Beyond the literal depiction of a bullfight, the painting seems to explore themes of power, control, and mortality. The arena itself becomes a metaphor for societal structures – a contained space where predetermined roles are enacted. The bull’s struggle can be interpreted as a representation of primal instinct against imposed order. The fallen figure introduces an element of vulnerability and the ever-present possibility of defeat. The subdued palette, punctuated by flashes of color in the costumes, reinforces the sense of formality and tradition surrounding this culturally significant event. Ultimately, the work invites contemplation on the complex relationship between humanity and nature, and the inherent risks involved in asserting dominance over the wild.