The Cook – Still Life Giuseppe Arcimboldo (1526-1593)
Giuseppe Arcimboldo – The Cook - Still Life
Edit attribution
Download full size: 3159×4165 px (1,4 Mb)
Painter: Giuseppe Arcimboldo
Location: Private Collection
Portrait or still life? A roast or a face? "The Cook" is one of Arcimboldo’s most successful and entertaining visual illusions. The court portraitist of Emperor Maximilian portrayed the cook, by which he once again earned the praise of the high person. The anthropomorphic image is based on the technique of pareidolia (creating illusions from images of other real objects). On an open silver tray are a rabbit, a turkey, and a pig roasted whole.
Description of the painting "The Cook" by Giuseppe Arcimboldo
Portrait or still life? A roast or a face? "The Cook" is one of Arcimboldo’s most successful and entertaining visual illusions. The court portraitist of Emperor Maximilian portrayed the cook, by which he once again earned the praise of the high person.
The anthropomorphic image is based on the technique of pareidolia (creating illusions from images of other real objects). On an open silver tray are a rabbit, a turkey, and a pig roasted whole. A truly imperial treat. When you turn the canvas, they turn into rather grim human facial features, and the plate into an element of knight’s armor. A little imagination and the green leaves become an elegant feather. Such experiments were not uncommon during the Renaissance. Giuseppe Arcimboldo was an acknowledged master of them during his lifetime.
"Being determines consciousness" - the sixteenth-century artist tried to express this tenet long before Hegel and Marx in the painting "The Cook". But he expressed it not with a pen, but with a brush. The second "inverted" image unequivocally alludes the viewer to the dualism of existence (its two beginnings). Rene Descartes came close to understanding this philosophical category a century later. Interpreting Arcimboldo’s paintings is difficult because the viewer is separated from the Renaissance by several hundred years.
Some researchers consider the work of the artist as the precursor of Surrealism. His imitators can be found even in the 21st century. The painting is perfectly preserved to this day. It can be seen in the National Museum of Sweden in Stockholm.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
















You cannot comment Why?
A metallic lid, held aloft by unseen hands partially visible at the top edge of the frame, casts a shadow over the head, further obscuring its features and creating an atmosphere of secrecy and concealment. The reflective surface of the lid draws attention to the light source, highlighting the grotesque nature of the subject matter.
The platter itself is adorned with minimal accoutrements: a single slice of lemon and a sprig of parsley. These elements introduce a jarring contrast – the freshness and vibrancy of the garnish stand in stark opposition to the morbid presentation of the head. This juxtaposition might be interpreted as a commentary on the act of consumption, or perhaps a satirical representation of culinary extravagance taken to an extreme.
The dark background serves to isolate the central figure, intensifying its impact and preventing any distraction from the unsettling scene. The artist’s use of chiaroscuro – the dramatic interplay of light and shadow – heightens the sense of drama and emphasizes the three-dimensionality of the head.
Subtexts within this work are numerous and open to interpretation. It could be a commentary on mortality, the fragility of human life, or the dehumanizing effects of power and control. The culinary context suggests a critique of societal excesses and potentially a dark satire of aristocratic indulgence. The absence of eyes is particularly significant; it strips the subject of identity and agency, reducing it to an object of consumption. Ultimately, the painting evokes feelings of discomfort, revulsion, and profound unease, prompting reflection on themes of life, death, and the human condition.