Rijksmuseum: part 2 – Helst, Lodewijk van der -- Adriana Jacobusdr Hinlopen (geb 1646). Echtgenote van Johannes Wijbrants, 1667
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see an elaborate hairstyle, featuring intricately braided tendrils framing her face and adorned with floral motifs – likely roses – that echo the decorative elements on her gown. A pearl necklace rests against her décolletage, a common symbol of purity and wealth in portraiture of this period. The earrings are understated but elegant, contributing to the overall impression of refined taste.
The woman’s dress is particularly noteworthy. It consists of a dark, possibly black or deep green, outer garment trimmed with pink fur, paired with a white lace collar that draws attention to her neck and shoulders. A large, ornate brooch, featuring what appears to be a cluster of jet beads, is prominently displayed on the bodice. The combination of colors – the somber darkness contrasted with the delicate pink – suggests a careful consideration of visual harmony and status.
The artist’s rendering of skin tones demonstrates an understanding of subtle variations in light and shadow, lending her face a lifelike quality. While theres a certain stillness to her expression, it is not devoid of character; a slight curve of the lips hints at a quiet intelligence or perhaps a touch of melancholy.
Subtly, the painting conveys notions of social standing and marital prospects. The richness of the fabrics, the intricate detailing of the jewelry, and the careful arrangement of her hair all point to a family of means and influence. The young woman’s age suggests she is likely of marriageable status, and the portrait itself serves as a visual advertisement for her desirability – a common practice in 17th-century Dutch society. The overall effect is one of controlled elegance and understated prosperity, characteristic of bourgeois portraiture from this era.