Rijksmuseum: part 2 – Vinckboons, David -- Boerenvreugd, 1619
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The peasants are depicted in various states of action. Some raise their arms defensively or aggressively, while others wield tools – what appear to be axes and other agricultural implements – as if intending to use them. Their expressions range from anger to amusement, contributing to the overall sense of disorder. A woman stands slightly apart from the immediate conflict, her expression a mixture of concern and apprehension; she holds a child who appears to be crying.
A dog is present near the fallen man, adding another layer of dynamism to the scene. It seems agitated, mirroring the turmoil of the human figures. The background reveals a village with a church spire visible in the distance, establishing a rural setting. A fence separates the foreground action from this tranquil backdrop, emphasizing the disruption caused by the conflict.
The painting’s subtexts likely revolve around themes of social class and power dynamics. The contrast between the finely dressed man and the rough-hewn peasants suggests a confrontation between different societal strata. It is possible that the scene depicts a moment of rebellion or retribution against authority, although the precise narrative remains ambiguous. The inclusion of the child introduces an element of vulnerability and potential future consequences stemming from this conflict. The overall impression is one of sudden upheaval and the disruption of established order within a seemingly peaceful rural community.