Harvest Zinaida Serebryakova (1884-1967)
Zinaida Serebryakova – Harvest
Edit attribution
Download full size: 1000×790 px (0,1 Mb)
Painter: Zinaida Serebryakova
Location: Fine Arts Museum, Odessa (Одеський художнiй музей).
Album navigation:
Just before the outbreak of World War I, the Russian artist Zinaida Serebryakova is forced to return to her homeland after an Italian trip. Arriving at the family estate hidden away in the province of Kharkov, she immediately begins to work on images of working peasants. She begins to write numerous sketches and paintings. During this period, she painted a huge canvas, which later destroys itself, leaving him a few small fragments. Based on the original sketches and studies, the artist planned in the composition to depict the images of peasants engaged in their usual mundane work.
ArtClub
Best Contemporary Atists
Description of Zinaida Serebryakova’s painting The Harvest
Just before the outbreak of World War I, the Russian artist Zinaida Serebryakova is forced to return to her homeland after an Italian trip.
Arriving at the family estate hidden away in the province of Kharkov, she immediately begins to work on images of working peasants. She begins to write numerous sketches and paintings. During this period, she painted a huge canvas, which later destroys itself, leaving him a few small fragments.
Based on the original sketches and studies, the artist planned in the composition to depict the images of peasants engaged in their usual mundane work. She was mainly interested in depicting the fields and the harvest.
Later, however, the artist completely reconsiders the subject and decides to depict several peasant women resting or eating during the harvest in the field. In particular, Serebryakova makes such a decision because of the mass absence of men from the fields, due to the approaching war.
In the composition created, the artist has decided to paint four young women, two of whom will be depicted standing and two of whom will be seated on a haystack. For the landscape the author chooses golden spikelets and yellow-green unploughed fields, as well as blue calm sky.
Zinaida Serebryakova places the horizon line unnaturally high. In the distance, among the fields, the domes of the local church are hidden behind the branches of the trees, as well as the houses of her nearby native village. The artist originally titled her painting "Peasant Girls in the Field.
Girls are depicted in traditional peasant clothing with scarves tied on their heads. Through such bright folk costumes Serebryakova was able to convey the everyday atmosphere of peasant life and get closer to her beloved people.
You cannot comment Why?
The arrangement of the figures suggests a hierarchy within their labor. One woman stands slightly apart, arms crossed, seemingly overseeing the work; her posture conveys a sense of authority or perhaps a moments respite from physical exertion. Another figure is positioned at the edge of the field, carrying what appears to be tools and supplies on her back, indicating logistical support for the harvesting process. Two women are actively engaged in binding sheaves of grain, their bodies bent in postures characteristic of repetitive manual labor. The central kneeling woman’s hands are carefully depicted as she ties the stalks together, highlighting the precision required for this task.
The landscape itself is rendered with a degree of idealized realism. Rolling hills fade into a hazy horizon under a sky filled with soft, billowing clouds. This expansive backdrop emphasizes the scale of the agricultural undertaking and subtly evokes a feeling of timelessness. The distant view hints at a broader settlement or village, suggesting a community reliant on this harvest for sustenance.
Subtly embedded within the scene are suggestions of social commentary. While the women appear physically robust and capable, their clothing suggests a modest economic status. Their faces, though not overtly expressive, convey a quiet dignity and resilience. The painting seems to explore themes of rural life, labor, community, and perhaps even the cyclical nature of agricultural existence. It avoids romanticizing hardship; instead, it presents an honest portrayal of work performed within a specific cultural context. The overall impression is one of both toil and connection – a visual testament to the enduring relationship between people and the land.