The Mockery Of The Owl Jan Van Kessel (1626-1679)

Here we observe a densely populated scene dominated by avian figures arranged around a gnarled and imposing tree. The composition is structured with a clear foreground featuring a landscape of low-lying vegetation and a body of water receding into the distance under a cloudy sky. This backdrop serves to emphasize the chaotic activity unfolding within the central focus: the assemblage of birds.
The artist depicted a diverse range of species, each rendered with considerable detail in terms of plumage and posture. A peacock, its tail prominently displayed, stands near the left edge, seemingly observing the commotion above. Several scarlet macaws are positioned on branches closer to the viewer, their vibrant colors contrasting sharply with the darker tones of the surrounding birds. An owl, centrally located within the tree’s foliage, appears to be reading a scroll or document, while other birds seem to be reacting to its actions – some with apparent amusement, others with disdain. A swan and a stork are positioned on the right side of the composition, adding to the variety of species present.
The arrangement of these creatures suggests a hierarchical structure, albeit one that is disrupted by the owl’s central position and the implied act of reading. The peacocks posture hints at an observer role, while the macaws seem to be participants in whatever drama unfolds. The presence of predatory birds like vultures and hawks introduces a sense of potential threat or judgment within this gathering.
Subtexts embedded within the painting appear to revolve around themes of knowledge, authority, and social critique. The owl, traditionally associated with wisdom, is presented as an object of ridicule or scrutiny by its peers. This challenges conventional notions of intellectual superiority and suggests a commentary on the fallibility of those in positions of power. The scroll held by the owl could represent dogma, established beliefs, or even political decrees, which are being questioned or mocked by the other birds.
The landscape itself contributes to the overall meaning. Its muted colors and receding perspective create a sense of distance and detachment from the events unfolding within the tree. This reinforces the idea that the scene is a symbolic representation rather than a literal depiction of nature. The inclusion of small, indistinct figures in the foreground further emphasizes this distancing effect, suggesting that the viewer is an outsider looking in on a private or critical moment.

The painting’s overall impact lies in its unsettling juxtaposition of beauty and chaos, order and disruption. It invites contemplation about the nature of knowledge, power, and the often-humorous ways in which societal norms are challenged and questioned.