Nikolay Feshin – Still life (1934-1955) 5
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 3 Ответы
Николай Фешин
Я в восхищении от живописи Николая Фешина! Он получал удовольствие от процесса. Это чувствуется. Кисть на одном дыхании передавала мысль и впечатление. Живое письмо. Актуально. Современно.
Это на столько звонко, манко по цвету, я восхищаюсь такой живописью!
You cannot comment Why?
The artist’s application of paint is characterized by visible brushstrokes and an impasto technique, particularly evident in the rendering of the flowers and fruit. This textural quality lends a tactile immediacy to the scene, suggesting a direct engagement with the subject matter. The light source appears to originate from the upper left, casting highlights on the petals and creating reflections on the polished surfaces of the dish and vase.
The color palette is restrained but rich, relying heavily on blues, reds, greens, and yellows. The dark background serves to isolate the objects in the foreground, intensifying their colors and forms. This creates a sense of intimacy and focus, drawing the viewer’s attention to the details of the arrangement.
Beyond the straightforward depiction of everyday objects, the painting evokes a feeling of quiet contemplation. The abundance of fruit might symbolize prosperity or fertility, while the daisies could represent innocence or simplicity. The reflective surfaces introduce an element of ambiguity; they distort and refract light, suggesting that appearances are not always what they seem. Theres a subtle melancholy present in the muted tones and the slightly disheveled arrangement, hinting at the transient nature of beauty and abundance. The overall effect is one of understated elegance and a poignant awareness of time’s passage.