Oath of the Horatii Jacques-Louis David (1748-1825)
Jacques-Louis David – Oath of the Horatii
Edit attribution
Download full size: 4250×3306 px (2,5 Mb)
Painter: Jacques-Louis David
Location: Museum of Art, Toledo, Ohio.
"The Oath of Horace" is a large painting painted by the French artist Jean-Louis David in 1784. The painting is currently in the Paris Louvre. Once the painting came out from under the master’s brush, it immediately gained great success with both the public and the critics. The painting "The Oath of Horace" remains one of the most famous paintings - representative of the neoclassical style. The painting depicts a scene from a Roman legend, referring to a dispute between two warring cities, Rome and Alba Long.
Description of Jean Louis David’s painting The Oath of Horace
"The Oath of Horace" is a large painting painted by the French artist Jean-Louis David in 1784. The painting is currently in the Paris Louvre. Once the painting came out from under the master’s brush, it immediately gained great success with both the public and the critics. The painting "The Oath of Horace" remains one of the most famous paintings - representative of the neoclassical style.
The painting depicts a scene from a Roman legend, referring to a dispute between two warring cities, Rome and Alba Long. Three brothers ready to fight for their city take a sacred oath, an oath to their father who blesses them in battle.
The painting is depicted in a neoclassical art style. Various artistic methods were used in its painting. Overlapping rows of profile figures is a common technique in classical art and is used in this painting as well.
The focus is on the crossed arms, depicted by the artist in straight lines, which adds to the classical clarity of David’s work. The clear organization of the painting, it has the strict symbolism of the number three, which again is another black of artistic classicism.
The brushstrokes are almost imperceptible, and all details are depicted as clearly as possible. This way of painting is characteristic of the Rococo style. The painter’s technique is aimed at the central figures, there are no hints of the veiled meaning of otherworldly objects.
The men are depicted in the picture as warriors - clear, rigid lines. This clarity emphasizes their bravery and determination. Whereas the women are secondary characters, only complementing the overall composition. The women are curved like arches, this emphasizes their desperation and distress.
This painting conveys the young men’s sense of patriotism, the father’s faith in his sons, and the women’s loyalty and devotion. David’s work, The Oath of Horace, reflects the values of the Enlightenment and is an example of Neoclassicism.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
To the right of the scene, a group of women occupies a lower plane. They are depicted in poses of distress – one is slumped onto a bench, her head bowed in grief; another leans forward with an expression of anguish, while a third appears to be weeping openly. Their garments are simple and flowing, contrasting sharply with the structured attire of the men.
The color palette is dominated by warm tones – reds, oranges, and browns – particularly evident in the clothing of the central male figure and the soldiers. This warmth contrasts with the cooler blues and whites used for the women’s dresses and the architectural backdrop. The lighting is dramatic, highlighting the muscular forms of the men while casting the women in a softer, more subdued light.
The arrangement suggests a deliberate staging of an event imbued with profound significance. The rigid postures and formal attire of the male figures convey a sense of duty, patriotism, and unwavering resolve. Their gesture – the raising of the swords – implies a pledge or oath being taken, likely one involving sacrifice or commitment to a higher cause.
The women’s presence introduces an element of emotional complexity. Their grief suggests that this act of dedication carries a personal cost, highlighting the potential for suffering and loss inherent in such commitments. The spatial separation between the men and women reinforces a perceived dichotomy – the public sphere of duty and honor versus the private realm of emotion and familial bonds.
The architectural setting itself contributes to the overall meaning. The arches evoke classical ideals of order, reason, and civic virtue, suggesting that this event is not merely personal but also carries broader implications for the state or community. The starkness of the space further emphasizes the gravity of the moment, stripping away any distractions from the central action.